Oleh/By		:	DATO' SERI DR. MAHATHIR BIN MOHAMAD 
Tempat/Venue 	: 	COPENHAGEN, DENMARK 
Tarikh/Date 	: 	11/03/95 
Tajuk/Title  	: 	THE UNITED NATIONS WORLD SUMMIT FOR 
			SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT 


 
    On behalf of the Malaysian delegation, I wish to convey
our deep appreciation to you and through you the  Government
and  people  of  Denmark  for  the  warm hospitality and the
excellent arrangements made.
2.   I also wish to acknowledge the important role played by
Ambassador Juan Somavia of Chile in his capacity as Chairman
of the Preparatory Committee.
3.   Although the 50 year-old Charter of the United  Nations
begins  with  the  words  "We  the  peoples  of  the  United
Nations....", this is, arguably, the first time that we meet
at this  level  to  discuss  the  common  people  and  their
problems; their social development.  That it has taken us 50
years  to  do this is a measure of our commitment to the lot
of the common people and an illustration of the  failure  of
multilateral  efforts,  derailed  for  over 5 decades by the
ideological battles of the Cold War.    That  confrontation,
usually  on  someone else's soil, has undermined most of the
social action plans  of  the  UN  agencies.    International
development  efforts  became  predicated  on  the  degree of
support that developing countries gave to either of the  two
superpowers.    Our  regions  became cockpits for superpower
manipulations and their fields of battle.    The  developing
countries  and  their  people  become mere marionettes.
4.    The wreckages,  the pain suffered and  the  injustices
inflicted,  have  left  many  of  these  countries crippled,
incapable  of  making  the  necessary  adjustments  to  meet
present  and  future  challenges.   Afghanistan, Somalia and
many  others  are  among  the  countries  that   have   been
pulverised;  their  infrastructure obliterated, their people
in total disarray.   The marginalisation  process  continues
even now, despite strides in science and technology.
5.   As for the peoples of the world, the vast majority have
suffered not only deprivation, but more importantly, loss of
human  dignity.    We are looking at over one billion people
caught in a spiral of abject  poverty  that  relegates  them
permanently to the status of subspecies.  The United Nations
is  faced  with  an  enormous  outflow  of some 19.7 million
international  refugees.     Admittedly,  migration   is   a
nightmare  for  the  developed countries but migrations also
cause severe dislocations and drain the developing countries
of essential human resources.   It does not  help  that  the
developed countries discriminatingly welcome the skilled and
the educated.
6.      Even  as the international community takes the first
fateful steps into the next millennium,  we  cannot  but  be
troubled  by the emergence of "failed states" in the wake of
the break-up and breakdown of nations.   The  magic  of  the
midnight  hour  at  the  moment  of  independence  cannot be
sustained.    Countries  stumble  and  retrogress  and   the
people's    expectations    remain    largely   unfulfilled;
paradoxically, at  a  time  of  qualitative  scientific  and
technological  advances  which  should  have  benefitted the
needy the most.
7.    Even among the  developed  countries,  elements  of  a
failed   state   can   be  detected.     Contradictions  and
polarisations have surfaced which reflect possible flaws  in
the   national   direction.      We   see  serious  poverty,
homelessness and joblessness, and rampant crime and drugs in
pockets of these societies,    even  in  the  most  advanced
countries.    For  these  countries  lessons  too need to be
learnt; change and adjustments should apply to them as well,
especially those relating  to  unbridled  and  unsustainable
high  incomes and consumption, and the breakdown and decline
in the moral values of  their  society.    These  countries,
supposedly  locomotives  of  world  growth  and  paragons of
standards, would do well to effect these changes instead  of
seeking to hold the high ground and preach to others.
8.    We also see aspects of racism and ethnic challenges in
these states.  Economic decline, malaise in society have  in
some  cases  dried up the humanitarian outlooks of the past.
Targets internationally agreed, such as the  0.7%  for  ODA,
reiterated  at  the Summit in Rio in 1992, have been largely
forgotten.  There is diminishing tolerance  coupled  with  a
rigid  insistence  on homogeneity with one group and one set
of values.  There was, for instance, a  national  convulsion
over  the  wearing  of  a  head  scarf  to  school in Europe
recently.  The implications are disturbing.   The future  of
humankind   must  point  towards  globalism,  pluralism  and
multi-culturalism, not exclusivity of regions and blocs  and
the  superiority of one set of values.
9.      We  remain  utterly  helpless as the bestialities in
Bosnia and in Rwanda are committed.   All of  the  political
will  of  Europe  could not save the thousands sacrificed in
Bosnia.  Chechnya is a domestic affair.   However,  Tian  An
Men  is  not.    All  of the machinery of the United Nations
could not respond to and prevent the  slaughter  in  Rwanda.
Indeed,  the  first  reaction  was to retreat from danger to
self.
10.   Since the end  of  the  Cold  War,  the  international
community  has  arrived  at  many  crossroads  and  defining
moments but we have fallen short in our collective  response
almost  every  time.    We move from one major conference to
another, pronouncing  with  lofty  intention  global  action
programmes  but  we have never satisfactorily made available
the means of implementation.  We seem to grope and to muddle
through to give meaning to global interconnectedness but  we
find  ourselves  being  only rhetorical, never quite able to
distinguish  between  self-interest   and   the   care   and
well-being of humankind and the welfare of the planet.
11.    In the last few years, the concept of development has
changed from one of synthetic economic targets  to  that  of
real   economic   gains,   securing   human  needs  and  the
optimisation  of  the  human  person  at   the   centre   of
development.  Obviously, the free market and selective human
rights alone will not do the job.  Unfortunately the failure
of  Communism    and  Fabian  Socialism  has  not taught any
lesson. Despite the weaknesses of capitalism  and  the  free
market,  only  one  western modal is permitted.  The obvious
failures of the so-called  locomotives  of  growth  are  not
acknowledged.    At the same time the sucessful economies of
Asia  and  Latin  America  are  not  regarded  as  potential
locomotives.    Instead  the  high  growth in these areas is
regarded as a threat to the industrial North.   It seems  to
be  the  agreed  policy  to  categorise  them  and  then put
impediments in their way.
12.  The developing world must not continue   to  be  looked
upon  as a bottomless pit, meant for wasted western handouts
and welfare programmes.  The developing world  needs  to  be
given  its  righful  place as much as the composition of the
Group   of   Seven   should   be   regarded   as   seriously
anachronistic.  All these require major changes in political
perceptions.    Also,  the  United Nations should cease from
continuing to be a place to discipline the developing  world
on the basis of a western model that "one size fits all".
13.    At  the  heart  of  development  lies  the  issue  of
governments  and  society.     Certainly,   if   governments
continuously  fail  to deliver, they should exit.  The issue
of governance and accountability, renewed by fresh  mandates
through the democratic process, applies to all, not just the
developing  countries.    Empowerment must take into account
the vulnerable groups, women and minorities  that  exist  in
all  societies.    In  this area much progress has been made
among the developing world.  The days of the  demigod leader
are largely over.
14.   In South East Asia  where change has been  effectively
managed, much has been taken stock of.  The obvious mistakes
of  the  West  will  not  be  repeated.   The  relevance  of
Government   and  a  focussed  national  purpose  through  a
supportive society remains the prerequisite for development.
We have left the socialistic concepts of the  welfare  state
for a workdriven,  fully participative society.
15.    For Malaysia, growth will be tempered with equity and
social responsibility.  While we try to harness the positive
elements of globalisation, where swift movements of capital,
technology and markets often outpace governments, we  remain
committed   towards   narrowing   income   and   opportunity
disparities.  I am confident we shall achieve our targets of
qualitative growth and the amelioration of  every  Malaysian
as  a  composite  resource  in  a  matrix  of  pluralism and
multi-culturalism.
16.   While in  the  first  25  years  of  independance  the
Malaysian  Government  has  been  the  major  actor  in  the
exercise to restructure society, the private sector has  not
only  been  involved  in  the  restructuring  process of our
society,  but  has  been  tasked  with   the   creation   of
opportunities  for  economic  growth in order to achieve the
nation's  objective  to  become  an  economically  developed
nation by the year 2020.
17.    We  are  determined  to develop the nation in our own
mould  along   all   dimensions;   economically,   socially,
politically,  spiritually,  psychologically  and culturally.
The vision is for a Malaysian society  that  is  democratic,
tolerant   and  caring,  economically  just  and  equitable,
progressive and prosperous, and in  full  possession  of  an
economy that is competitive, dynamic, robust and resilient.
18.   While we and our neighbours try to make socio-economic
progress, we cannot  but  lament  the  external  impediments
which  threaten  to  derail  us.    We  are  concerned about
pressures and other means by some in the North to erode  our
limited   comparative   advantages,  particular  labour  and
natural resources.  The North had exploited fully these very
same assets in their own countries and  in  ours  when  they
ruled  us.   Now they seek to stifle our growth by involving
human  rights,   the   social   clause   and   environmental
conditionalities.   Did they care for these things when they
were at our stage of development?
19.  I give my commitment, speaking on behalf of  my  people
and  country,  that  Malaysia will support the decisions and
programmes of Copenhagen.   I hope Copenhagen  will  not  be
Rio.  It should not merely be remembered for the declaration
or  the  plan of action.   Copenhagen should be recalled for
being the starting point of a new determination to sincerely
put  into  effect  the  programme  to  meet  the  needs  and
aspirations of people, the focus of our decision.
     Thank you Mr. Chairman

 
 



 
Google