Oleh/By		:	DATO' SERI DR. MAHATHIR BIN MOHAMAD 
Tempat/Venue 	: 	CARTEGENA DE INDIAS, COLOMBIA 
Tarikh/Date 	: 	18/10/95 
Tajuk/Title  	: 	THE ELEVENTH CONFERENCE OF HEADS OF 
			STATE OR GOVERMENT OF THE 
			NON-ALIGNED COUNTRIES 



           May I, firstly, congratulate you on your assumption as
    the Chairman of the Non-Aligned Movement.  My delegation and
    I are happy to be here at this historic city of Cartagena as
    our Movement celebrates its fortieth anniversary.

    2.    I would also like to  express our deep appreciation to
    the outgoing Chairman, H.E. President Soeharto of Indonesia,
    who has provided invaluable leadership to the Movement at  a
    critical  time as we entered the post Cold War period of the
    1990s.

    3.    When we last met at Jakarta in 1992, we were caught in
    the  euphoria  following  upon  the end of the Cold War.  We
    raised  questions  over  the  relevance  of  our   Movement,
    including   the   very  name  itself.    That  euphoria  has
    dissipated.  The international situation has  relapsed  into
    the  old state of uncertainty.  International leadership, be
    it by the major powers or the  United  Nations,  has  become
    vague  as  confrontations  at the interstate and intra-state
    levels increased.  Questions have again been asked over  the
    role  and  relevance  of  the  Non-Aligned  Movement.    Our
    inability to collectively stand against the nuclear  weapons
    states  over the Non-Proliferation Treaty last June has been
    cited by our detractors as marking the beginning of the  end
    of the Movement.

    4.    NAM was  forged  40  years ago to  be the  third force
    between  the  two  superpower  blocs.  NAM  was designed  to
    play the pivotal role in liberating the world from those who
    dominated  it  through  colonialism  and  other   forms   of
    hegemony.   NAM was expected to promote democratic relations
    among states and to help the growth of developing countries,
    through enhanced South-South and North-South relations.

    5.    The   political   struggle   has   not  been   without
    achievements;  especially against colonialism and apartheid.
    But the domination of the world by  a  select  few  remains.
    This  is  evident  in  their  control  of  the international
    institutions that deal with issues  of  world  security  and
    economy.    The  Security  Council  and  the  Bretton  Woods
    institutions remain under the firm grip of a few  countries.
    The  domination  now  manifests  itself in efforts to impose
    their values  and  standards  in  total  disregard  for  the
    cultures  and  traditions of others.  And so the fundamental
    challenge to our Movement remains  that  of  addressing  the
    domination  of  the  world  by  a  select few, now no longer
    divided into opposing blocs, whose decisions  are  primarily
    motivated by their own narrow national interests.

    6.    Let  us  at Cartagena  send  a  clear  message to  our
    detractors that NAM is still alive and  intends  to  play  a
    major  role  in the post-cold war era.  NAM is a major forum
    for consultations and coordination of positions  on  crucial
    political   and   economic   issues   among  the  developing
    countries.  It is still the only forum where Heads of  State
    and  Government  of  the  South  can  meet  to take stock of
    developments which affect all of us.  NAM, on behalf of  the
    South,  will  continue  to champion the just cause for a new
    world order based on the principles of justice, equality and
    democracy in international relations.

    7.    Apart from successfully fighting colonialism,apartheid
    and other forms of racism, NAM has  historically  stood  for
    disarmament,  both  nuclear and conventional.   We must join
    forces with those  outside  our  movement  and  continue  to
    struggle  for total nuclear disarmament.  NAM must be at the
    forefront of humanity's efforts to outlaw  nuclear  weapons,
    as chemical weapons have been outlawed.  We must ban nuclear
    weapons  now for we doubt the future capacity of the nuclear
    powers to defuse, decommission and  destroy  these  weapons.
    Already  we are seeing the rusting nuclear warships probably
    with nuclear weapons abandoned carelessly  at  their  bases.
    We  know  some  nuclear  submarines have been disposed of by
    sinking them in the sea.  Looking  at  Chernobyl and the $ 4
    billion  bill  for  making  it  safe, we truly fear that the
    owners of these weapons may not have the will or  the  means
    to  defuse  them safely later.   It should be noted that the
    disposal of chemical weapons and atomic waste in  the  Irish
    sea  after  the  War  is  already  creating problems for the
    littoral states.  Improper disposal of massive quantities of
    nuclear  material  and  weapons  may  cause  a  disaster  of
    frightening proportion.

    8.    Admittedly, the South, which this Movement represents,
    was never a single monolithic entity.  It was a grouping  of
    nations with widely differing interests, united largely by a
    common  colonial  past.    Despite  becoming independent and
    sovereign,  many  of  us  in  the  South  continue   to   be
    economically  weak  and  dependent on the North.   Political
    freedom has not cut loose the economic chains.  High  levels
    of poverty -- pose the greatest threat to the very existence
    of many of us.

    9.    Before  the  South  can collectively demand that it be
    taken  seriously  as  a  partner,  and  a  player   in   the
    international  arena,  it must confront and overcome its own
    weaknesses.   A  shared  colonial  past  cannot  permanently
    guarantee the unity and cohesion of the South.

    10.   Ethnic,  tribal and  religious differences have led to
    the collapse  of  many  governments,  often  culminating  in
    brutal  and  protracted  civil  wars.    The freedom that we
    gained at great cost and sacrifice has  been  squandered  by
    many  of us.  There is no place in our societies as there is
    no place in any society for genocide, ethnic  cleansing,  or
    other  forms  of  oppression.    Development, eradication of
    poverty and the  upliftment  of  our  people,  must  be  the
    over-riding  goals of the process of  nation-building in the
    South.

    11.  Many of us have spent billions on armaments and weapons
    of destruction when  we  should  be  fighting  malnutrition,
    illiteracy  and  disease.    The goal of sustaining national
    integrity  is  better  pursued  through  effective   dispute
    settlement mechanisms, preferably at regional level, without
    external   interferences   nor   an  excessive  reliance  on
    destructive armaments.

    12.   It is actually in the interest of the  more prosperous
    states  of  the  world to help the most destitute.  Economic
    deprivation and social misery which destabilise poor nations
    will result in massive migrations which may  not  always  be
    possible to stop.  But we in the developing countries cannot
    depend  on  the  prosperous  nations to help us against this
    fate.  We have seen them fail too  many  times  to  rely  on
    their  enlightened  self-interest.   We have to do the right
    things for ourselves.

    13.   Fortunately, for us the  debilitating stranglehold  of
    political ideologies has been relaxed.  The main concern for
    everyone  now  is economic development and the well-being of
    our people.  All of us have some kind of economic  resource.
    The  exploitation of these resources is relatively easy, now
    that ideology no longer dictates and hamstrings the process.
    We can institute internal reforms aimed at removing some  of
    the  disincentives  that are inherent in our systems.  If we
    are prepared to do this, we would reduce our  dependence  on
    the  developed  nations and would be strengthening ourselves
    and our movement as well.

    14.   Malaysia's experience has been that moderate  policies
    encourage investments and economic growth.  The result is to
    enhance our freedom and independence.  It may bring the same
    results  for  others.   But we admit that what works for one
    country may not work for  another.    Much  depends  on  our
    perceptions  and culture.  Still the exchange of information
    on our experiences in development should be worthwhile.

    15.  The continued relevance of the Movement is dependent on
    the promotion of a collective agenda.   NAM must be  at  the
    vanguard  of  our efforts to enhance ties between the member
    countries as well as with the North.   In  this  regard  the
    cooperative  endeavours  with the Group of 88, symbolised by
    the Joint Coordination Committee, is a welcome  development.
    It  should  reduce  duplication and ensure the advocacy of a
    common programme on behalf of the South.

    16.   The role of think-tanks  in  the  advancement  of  our
    collective  interests  and positions needs to be recognised.
    The South Centre under Mwalimu  Nyerere,  established  after
    the work of the South Commission was completed, has rendered
    invaluable  service to this Movement.  We need to strengthen
    this Centre without turning it into another bureaucracy.

    17.   In a world where national  boundaries  have been  made
    porous  by  business  flows,  it  is timely for the South to
    accord priority to the role of the business  community.    I
    applaud your initiative, Mr. Chairman, to convene a Business
    Forum  during this meeting.  Business-led growth is critical
    to South-South relations.    No  amount  of  blueprints  and
    action  plans  can  succeed  if they are not anchored by the
    captains of trade and industry.

    18.  Towards this end the role of the Group of 15 Developing
    Countries has  been  significant. Organised  after  the  NAM
    meeting  in  Belgrade  in  1989,  the Group has been able to
    identify and promote a number of  innovative  processes  and
    institutions which facilitate trade and commerce between the
    members  as  well  as  with  other  countries  of the South.
    Significant  among  these  innovations  are  the   Bilateral
    Payments  Arrangements  which  can  overcome the shortage of
    foreign exchange needed for  trade;  the  South  Investment,
    Trade  and  Technology  Data Exchange Centre (SITTDEC) which
    provides invaluable data for  economic  interaction  between
    the   countries  of  the  South,  the  Gene  Banks  and  the
    Educational Centres of Excellence in the South.

    19.   While South-South relations are significant, we should
    not  ignore  or downplay our historical political solidarity
    at the international level.  NAM should not  be  reduced  to
    being  a  forum  for  seeking  support for our candidatures.
    This Movement has traditionally championed the  cause  of  a
    just  and  equitable world order.  It has vigorously pursued
    egalitarianism  and  social  justice   in   addressing   the
    asymmetries in the multilateral system.  The democratisation
    of  the  multilateral  system,  including  the reform of the
    Security Council, has remained important objectives of  this
    Movement.

    20.   For  the  first  time,  the  major  powers are equally
    anxious  to  have  these  reforms,  although  for  different
    reasons.      It  is  important  therefore  that  the  South
    articulates its own Agenda for Reform  of  the  Multilateral
    System.    We cannot defend the status quo, which many of us
    had  no  hand  in  its  formulation  nor  in  its  effective
    functioning.

    21.   The restructuring of the multilateral system should be
    designed  to   facilitate   a   comprehensive   multilateral
    framework  which  will  strengthen  global  peace, security,
    economic  growth  and  development.      The   institutional
    structures  that  deal  with issues of war and peace, growth
    and development need to be reformed taking into account  the
    interests of developing countries.

    22.   We  must  ensure that the tragedies of Rwanda, Bosnia-
    Herzegovina, Somalia and Cambodia are  not  repeated.    The
    present  U.N.  and  the Security Council cannot be entrusted
    with the task of forestalling such  tragedies.    In  Bosnia
    more  than  three  years of brutalities and massacres by the
    Serbs were tolerated while the U.N. and NATO argued over who
    had more authority.  Despite the delay, the U.S.  Government
    should be congratulated for forcing Nato and the U.N. to act
    finally.   The U.N. and the Secretariat have been more of an
    obstruction to peace than upholding the  principles  of  the
    U.N.    Clearly  the U.N., its Secretariat and in particular
    the Security Council must be reformed if the world is to  be
    made   safe  from  the  kind  of  gross  injustices  we  see
    everywhere today.

    23.  The South must remain united in facing the moves within
    the North which seeks to portray the South either as objects
    of pity and charity or as rising economic competitors.  Some
    within the North have advocated the enforcement of arbitrary
    and unilateral conditionalities ostensibly  to  protect  the
    environment and safeguard the interest of labour.  These sly
    moves  must  be  rejected  for  they  are  nothing more than
    attempts to keep the South in permanent bondage  by  keeping
    them continuously poor and unstable.

    24.   As  we prepare to  leave Cartagena, we must rededicate
    our collective determination to promote our  common  agenda.
    Our  struggle  for  a  better and more equitable world and a
    secure future premised on the purposes and principles of the
    U.N.  Charter is far from over.  We need to soldier on  with
    unabated  zeal  and  resoluteness  of  purpose  if we are to
    realise these goals.

 
 



 
Google