Oleh/By		:	DATO' SERI DR. MAHATHIR BIN MOHAMAD 
Tempat/Venue 	: 	BEIJING, CHINA 
Tarikh/Date 	: 	26/08/96 
Tajuk/Title  	: 	THE 2ND MALAYSIA - CHINA FORUM 1996 



     1.    I  have  been  asked to  present  a  Malaysian
    perspective  on  the  `Asia  Century'.   By  this  I
    presume  we  mean the 21st Century which  many  have
    predicted  will  be  the  Century  when  Asia   will
    dominate  the  world. This idea of domination  by  a
    continent  is  too simplistic and is really  not  in
    keeping with the times.
    
    2.    It is more simple and accurate to describe the
    19th  century  as  the century of  Europe.  In  fact
    European  domination  of the world  started  earlier
    than  that.  If there is a significant date, it  was
    1492, the year Columbus `discovered' America i.e. if
    we  can  concede that he discovered it. The misnamed
    `Indians'  were there before him.  They had  already
    discovered their land from the frozen North to Tiera
    Del  Fuego in the extreme tip of the horn  of  South
    America.   But the Europeans have always  considered
    Europe  as the centre of the world and all geography
    and  history must be related to it.  And so we  East
    Asians  are in the Far East.  As the world is round,
    we   have  every  right  to  use  ourselves  as  the
    reference point and describe America as being in the
    East and Europe in the Far East.  But we Asians  are
    too  polite  to  be assertive.  Actually  of  course
    China  was the true Middle Kingdom and if  there  is
    going  to  be  an Asian Century, then  China  should
    resume being the reference point.
    
    3.    Part of the 20th Century has been described as
    the  American  Century.  In the aftermath  of  World
    War  II  America indeed dominated the world.   Fifty
    percent of the world's economy was generated by  the
    United States.  It could afford to be generous  then
    and  it was.  But in the fourth quarter of the  20th
    Century America or more correctly the United  States
    is  no longer the dominant world economic power.  It
    is,  however,  still the world's  dominant  military
    power. If we take this fact into consideration, then
    the  20th Century can be labelled the United  States
    century.  Of course the demise of Communism and  the
    emasculation  of the USSR make this assertion  quite
    true.
    
    4.    Now  there is much talk about the next century
    being  the Asian Century.  The European century  and
    the  American century crept on us unawares.  We  did
    not  realise  what  was  happening  until  they  had
    happened.   And so we were not able to adjust,  much
    less  to  resist.  One by one we in Asia and  Africa
    and the Americas submitted.
    
    5.    But the so-called Asian century, i.e. the 21st
    Century has been announced early. Indeed it has been
    a  subject  worthy  of dialogues and  seminars.  Its
    implications   have   been  widely   discussed,   in
    particular  the danger that it poses to humanity  at
    large.
    
    6.    It  is  the yellow Peril all over again,  only
    this  time there are tinges of brown.  There is fear
    that Genghis Khan and the whole Tartar-Mongol hordes
    are  about  to ravage and savage the world,  killing
    and  raping  and  running  away  with  flaxen-haired
    damsels after the gallant men have been massacred.
    
    7.    China has come in for special attention.   For
    years it had been condemned for being Communist  and
    isolationist,  practising a close centrally  planned
    economy.   Now  it has opened up and has  adopted  a
    version  of the universally acclaimed market system.
    Instead of being welcomed to the fold, it is  looked
    upon  with fear and suspicion.  The World  Bank  has
    sounded  the  alarm by predicting  that  China  will
    emerge  in  the  21st Century as the greatest  world
    economic power.  And fear of China has mounted.
    
    8.   Suggestions have been made that China will be a
    threat  if  it is not already one.  Action  must  be
    taken  to  curb  China's increasing economic  clout.
    Alliances  must  be  formed  against  it,   military
    alliances  in  particular,  but  economic  alliances
    also.  If  China joins any grouping,  that  grouping
    must have the presence of a particular Western super
    power.   Japan and Korea have been told  to  beware.
    They  must  not  enter into any alliances  in  which
    China is a member while Western powers aren't.
    
    9.     That  China,  unlike  the  West,  had   never
    conquered much less colonised its neighbours, should
    not  be  taken to mean that it will not do  so  now.
    China is big and it is powerful and so it must  have
    imperial ambitions.
    
    10.   That  there are today powers outside Asia  who
    have   in  fact  tried  to  arrogate  to  themselves
    extraterritorial  rights do not seem  to  faze  them
    when  they play up the China bogey.  We Asians  must
    trust    non-Asians   because   Asians   are    less
    trustworthy.  It hurts us Asians that people  should
    tell  us  to trust them simply because they are  not
    Asians.   The  implication is that we ourselves  are
    untrustworthy.
    
    11.   The frame of mind of a lot of people regarding
    the  Asian  Century is not healthy.  Yet  the  Asian
    Century is not likely to materialise even.  Asia  is
    not  Europe.  Asia is only an arbitrary geographical
    entity.   It is not a political entity.  It  is  not
    even an ethnic entity.  The peoples who inhabit Asia
    are so different from each other that they should be
    identified  not  as  Asians but as  distinct  ethnic
    groups.    While  Europeans  and  Americans  largely
    follow  one religion, the variety of religions  that
    Asians  believe  in  is quite astounding.   Animism,
    paganism  and all the other known religions  of  the
    world  are  not  only  to  be  found  in  the  Asian
    continent  but  they  clearly  divide  Asians   into
    bitterly  antagonistic groups.  In the extreme  West
    of  the Asian Continent, the Muslim Arabs are  still
    fighting  their age-old enemy,  the   Hebrew   Jews.
    In  South Asia Hindus are still fighting Muslims and
    Buddhists are still fighting Hindus.
    
    12.   In  the  so-called Far East, the  Chinese  and
    Koreans  are  still  glaring at the  Japanese,  when
    Europe  had already forgiven the Germans  and  world
    Jewry  seem  prepared  to overlook  and  forget  the
    atrocities  committed by the Nazis.   Asians  cannot
    yet   forget   the  comfort  women,   although   the
    generation  who fought the war are almost  all  dead
    now.
    
    13.   With all this diversity can there be an  Asian
    century?    Even   in  the  economic   field   their
    development  is uneven.  While many Asian  countries
    are  impoverished,  others are  wallowing  in  great
    wealth.   Most  of the economic growth is  happening
    only  in  one  corner of Asia, in East  Asia.   Even
    South    East   Asia   is   not   really   developed
    economically.  Some are still dependent on  aid  and
    are  therefore not about to confront the  West,  the
    principal members of the aid clubs.
    
    14.   The  East  Asians from where the  Asian  shock
    troops  for the Asian Century are supposed to  come,
    are unlikely to cooperate with each other.  The idea
    of  an  East Asian Caucus has been rejected by major
    East  Asian economies simply because they feel their
    loyalties  do  not  lie with  Asia.   One  gets  the
    feeling  that when it comes to the crunch  they  are
    quite  likely  to turn against their  fellow  Asians
    rather  than against the non-Asians, in the economic
    field and probably in the military field also.
    
    15.   Most Asians have not been able to get over the
    feeling of inferiority that decades and centuries of
    colonialism   have  wrought  in   them.   They   are
    politically independent but psychologically they are
    still  colonised.   The desire to  please  the  non-
    Asians is strong among them.  Their value system and
    their  way  of thinking is still very much dominated
    by  Western thinkers.  Their youth in particular ape
    the non-Asians in dress, hair styles and behaviour.
    
    16.  The point I am trying to make is that the Asian
    Century, if indeed there will be one, will  pose  no
    threat to anyone.  They are likely to implode  as  a
    result   of   their   own  weight  and   centripetal
    pressures.  Some of them will be powerful, but  they
    will  be powerful on their own, as countries of Asia
    and  not as Asians of the Asian continents.  And  as
    countries  they  can  be dealt with  the  way  other
    countries  are dealt with.  In fact other  countries
    in  Asia,  far  from ganging up with their  powerful
    Asian  neighbours are more likely to  try  and  curb
    them.    Certainly  they  will  compete   with   the
    achievers  among them.  In the process the  powerful
    will  get  weakened and so diminish their threat  to
    the rest of the world.
    
    17.   However,  it is hoped that there  will  be  no
    confrontation  among  Asian  countries,  nor  should
    there  be between powerful Asian countries and  non-
    Asians.   I would like to think that powerful  Asian
    economies  will serve as the locomotives  of  growth
    not just for other Asian countries but for the whole
    world.
    
    18.   We have repeated ad nauseam that the world  is
    getting smaller; it is becoming a village.  There is
    very  little  privacy in a village  and  there  will
    similarly be less privacy in the global village.  We
    will   all  be  able  to  look  over  each   other's
    shoulders. There will be satellites everywhere  with
    the  capability for very minute definition.   People
    will  be  able  to see everything that  everyone  is
    doing.  Secrecy would be practically impossible.
    
    19.   What this means is that we, the nations of the
    world, will not be able to spring surprises on  each
    other.   And  surprise is the single most  important
    element in any military or economic adventure.  Only
    Japan  managed  to  surprise the unsuspecting  world
    economically.  No other Asian will be allowed to  do
    the same again.
    
    20.  The massing of troops or the sailing of a fleet
    in  any  direction will be on television watched  by
    everyone  everywhere.  Pearl Harbour and  Tora  Tora
    cannot happen now.  We are informed that the burying
    of their massacred victims by the Serbs was recorded
    on video and still.  The testing of weapons, nuclear
    or  otherwise, will be fully observed.  If there  is
    going to be a war there will be a war but there will
    be  no  victory  for anyone, only  total  and  final
    destruction of the world.  No matter how powerful  a
    nation is it will not relish self-destruction.   The
    present maneuvering is to ensure that only one  side
    has  the capacity to destroy the others.  We  should
    welcome  this,  except that that side  has  made  it
    clear  that  it  is as capable of  bullying  as  the
    potential  Asian super-power.  Our choice is  really
    between one super terror and another, and that is no
    choice at all.
    
    21.  But the likelihood of Asia dominating or of one
    Asian  nation  dominating the world  is  actually  a
    fanciful dream.  The more likely scenario is a world
    in  which  there  are many powers,  economic  powers
    mainly.  These powers are not going to be all Asian.
    There  will  be,  as  there are  now,  European  and
    American powers, each a match for any of the others.
    All  these economic powers in the East and the West,
    in   Asia  and  outside  Asia,  will  act   as   the
    locomotives of growth for the rest of the world.
    
    22.  They will invest in the poor countries and they
    will  be  the markets for the products of  the  poor
    countries,  products which will be  manufactured  by
    their  own  subsidiaries.  In the process  the  poor
    countries  will be enriched and then of course  they
    will buy the products of the rich countries.  So  in
    investing  in the poor countries the rich  countries
    will  actually be developing markets for  their  own
    products.  Surely this will be better than trying to
    stifle the economic growth of the poor.
    
    23.  If this should happen and it is likely that  it
    would  happen, then the 21st Century will not be  an
    Asian Century; it will be the century when the world
    takes   precedence  over  the  narrow  interest   of
    continents  or  nations.  This is a better  scenario
    for all the denizens of the world.
    
    24.   I  am sure everyone will opt for this scenario
    rather  than inter-continental confrontations  which
    the  Asian Century conjures.  But the century of the
    world  will not happen if we all talk of  the  Asian
    Century,  especially when we openly voice  or  fears
    over  the possibility that some Asian nations  might
    become  powerful.   We  should downplay  this  Asian
    Century thing but play up the Century of the  world,
    the  century when the world comes together, to build
    greater prosperity for everyone.
    
    25.  Even now we can see how we need each other, how
    continents  and  countries  need  each  other.   The
    wealth  of  East Asia did not originate entirely  in
    East  Asia.   On the contrary much of it  originated
    from trade between the Asian countries and the West;
    Europe  and America.  Europe and America  served  as
    the  engine  of growth for Japan, Korea, Taiwan  and
    Singapore and now of the so-called tigers  of  South
    East Asia.
    
    26.   It  is  true  that trade  between  East  Asian
    countries is growing by leaps and bounds.   This  is
    only  natural.   As  the East Asian  countries  grow
    richer   then   trade  will  grow,   trade   between
    themselves  and trade between them and the  rest  of
    the  world. Let us remember that when East Asia  was
    poor,  trade between Europe and America was  greater
    than  trade  between the West and Asia.  Trade  goes
    where there is wealth.
    
    27.   Asians, no matter how rich they may  be,  will
    not  forsake  non-Asian  countries  and  continents.
    They  are not snooty.  If they smell money they will
    follow  their  noses.  They have already  said  that
    they  do not want to form trade blocs.  They  insist
    they  believe in open regionalism.  But clearly  the
    West  does not seem to trust them, to take  them  at
    their words.
    
    28.   Perhaps the West have reasons for doubting the
    words  of  the  Asians.  Some Asian  countries  have
    always  been  unwilling to open  up  their  markets.
    They  say they want to; they say they are, but  they
    create  all kinds of obstacles, non-tariff  barriers
    against trade.  How can you believe what the  Asians
    say!   The  West  is justified in not  trusting  the
    Asians.   But is it fair to tar all the Asians  with
    the  same brush? Some Asian countries have been open
    all the time. And some are obviously opening up now.
    The process is slow but it is happening.
    
    29.   On  the  other hand, although the  West  seems
    open,  it is simply because they believe that Asians
    would never have the products, manufactured goods in
    particular, to compete in their market.   They  were
    generous  until  suddenly they realised  that  their
    monopoly  of  the  manufacturing industry  had  been
    broken.   The  cheap poor quality Asian goods  which
    had  challenged them in the past and which they  had
    carelessly  brushed  aside,  had  suddenly  changed.
    Asian goods had become high quality goods while  the
    price  remained low.  At this stage  the  West  felt
    they  could no longer be generous.  And so they took
    measures  to obstruct Asian products, some of  which
    measures can only be regarded as unethical.
    
    30.    Asians  should  really  distrust  the  ethnic
    Europeans.   But they don't.  They still believe  in
    the  integrity of the Europeans.  And they  keep  on
    trying  to conform to the onerous conditions  placed
    on  them  in  order  to continue  trading  with  the
    Europeans.
    
    31.   If only the ethnic Europeans can overcome this
    prejudices,  trade  and  other  intercourse  between
    Asian  countries and the ethnic Europeans of  Europe
    and America would get bigger and healthier.  If they
    do,  then  the  21st  century should  usher  in  the
    century   of   the  world,  the  century   of   true
    international inter-dependence.
    
    32.   Again I say, we all should cease talking about
    the  impending Asian Century.  We should talk  about
    the World Century instead.  Truly there is merit and
    profit  in  the countries of the world believing  in
    being members of the international community than in
    being Asians, Europeans, Africans, Latinos, etc.
    
    33.  If I may I would like to talk about a Malaysian
    experiment which may have some relevance to the idea
    of   being  interdependent  members  of  the   world
    community of nations.
    
    34.    In   Malaysia  as  in  other  countries   the
    Government  regarded the private sector  as  selfish
    and avaricious.  The administration must keep itself
    apart from the business community.  They should make
    life  as  difficult  as possible  for  the  business
    people.   Rules and regulation, laws and  red  tapes
    were  designed  to impress upon the business  people
    the superiority of the administrators.  The business
    people  were made to realise that although they  may
    have  all the money but they will always be  at  the
    bottom of the pecking order.
    
    35.   Suddenly it dawned upon the elected Government
    of  Malaysia that this confrontative stance  of  the
    administration  against the business  community  was
    not  contributing  at all to the well-being  of  the
    nation. If we must have the private sector, why  not
    cooperate  with  them.  And so  Malaysia  officially
    adopted  the  Malaysia Incorporated concept  despite
    the  fact that Japan Incorporated was regarded as  a
    kind  of  sneaky  arrangement between  the  Japanese
    administration and the business community.
    
    36.   To  cut a long story short, the change from  a
    confrontative  stance to one of cooperation  between
    two   entities   within   a   nation   resulted   in
    accelerating  the  development of  Malaysia.   There
    must  have  been  other  factors  of  course  but  a
    business-friendly      administration      expedited
    approvals,  the main obstacle in the development  of
    any   country.   And  so  Malaysia  today  is   very
    different  from what it was before the  adoption  of
    the Malaysia Incorporated concept.
    
    37.   The  lesson  of  this experience  is  obvious,
    cooperation    is   better   for    everyone    than
    confrontation.  Now  if  instead  of  fearing  Asian
    countries and attempting to obstruct their progress,
    the  West  cooperates and helps  instead,  all  will
    profit  in one way or another.  There will  be  less
    time  wasted on finding ways and means to  frustrate
    each  other and to delay what must happen  some  day
    anyway.
    
    38.   Malaysia believes in prospering thy neighbour,
    not beggaring thy neighbour.  Malaysia believes that
    by  prospering thy neighbour Malaysia  will  prosper
    also.  On a grander scale if the West will help Asia
    to  prosper, the West will prosper too.   Indeed  if
    Asia and the West prosper, then the whole world will
    prosper, including Africa and Latin America.
    
    39.   There  will  then be no Asian Century.   There
    will  be  for  the first time a world  century  -  a
    century of prosperity for everyone.  And all that is
    needed is to stop making a bogey of Asian countries.
    We  do not want to be prosperous for the purpose  of
    making others poor.  It is not a zero sum game  that
    we  are after.  A world of haves and have nots  adds
    nothing to the sum total of the achievement of  this
    modern  world.   A  world of haves  will  result  in
    creating more wealth for everyone.
    
    40.  Perhaps this sounds too  idealistic.  But if we
    are  not  allowed  to have ideals  then  life  would
    become  very barren indeed.  Ideals are for striving
    towards.   We  may not achieve this high  aspiration
    but we may get some way towards it.
    
    41.  As I said at the beginning I have been asked to
    talk  on the `Asia Century'.  For an Asian, it is  a
    tantalisingly attractive idea, most appealing to the
    Asian ego.  But this is not the 19th century or even
    the early 20th century.  The 21st Century will see a
    different world, a world so shrunken that we  cannot
    even  recognise borders anymore.  We are  told  that
    with  Information  Technology we have  to  accept  a
    borderless  world.  If there is to be  a  market  it
    will  no  longer be a European market or an American
    market  or  an  Asian market.  It will  be  a  world
    market  in  which  no continent or  country  can  be
    neglected.   With  this there can  be  no  isolating
    anyone, neither countries nor continents.
    
    42.   Europe has become the European Union,  America
    has  NAFTA,  the  Pacific has APEC etc.   Everywhere
    countries  are  merging, across borders  and  across
    continents.  If there is any division at all  it  is
    within  continents.   Asia is divided.   Europe  and
    America  are  not.   And  so although  there  was  a
    European Century, an American Century, there  cannot
    be an Asian Century.  It is just not in keeping with
    the times.
    
    43.   Some  countries in Asia will emerge  as  great
    economic  powers.   But most  will  be  mediocre  or
    actually poor.  Just because a few will be rich  and
    presumably powerful does not mean that Asia would be
    powerful.  The average Asian per capita will  remain
    very  low by comparison at least, if not in absolute
    terms.   The  situation will not  be  deserving  the
    appellation,  the  Asian  Century.   It  cannot   be
    described as the East Asian Century even.
    
    44.   Let  us forget these ego massaging theme,  the
    Asian  Century.  Let us not make a bogey of it.   If
    China  becomes,  by  sheer weight  of  numbers,  the
    world's greatest economic entity, it will still  not
    become the Middle Kingdom again.  There will  be  no
    Silk  Road,  no  Genghiz Khan, no Tartar  or  Mongol
    hordes.   But  there  will be a lot  of  Asians  and
    ethnic Europeans scurrying around to do business  in
    the  Century  of  the world.  Excepting  for  Japan,
    technologically the ethnic Europeans will still have
    the  edge.   Asians will continue  to  buy  European
    technology and apply it to their business.  And  the
    world will be richer for it.
    
    45.  Besides, the peoples of the world are going  to
    be more and more mobile.  They are going to migrate,
    at times in very large numbers.  They will not be so
    easily  assimilated.   As a  result  there  will  be
    practically no single ethnic nation.  All  countries
    will  have  multiracial  population  like  Malaysia.
    Most  of  them  will not only remember their  roots,
    they  are  going  to retain their links  with  their
    countries of origin.
    
    46.   So  far  we have seen only African,  Arab  and
    Asian migration to European countries.  The day will
    certainly  come  when  Europeans  will  migrate  and
    settle  in  Asian and African countries.  They  will
    come  from  Eastern Europe initially but  eventually
    the Western Europeans will follow.
    
    47.   In  the new Central Asian Republics there  are
    already Russians, Ukrainians and Germans, beside the
    Koreans.   These  Europeans  apparently  live  quite
    comfortably not in exclusive enclaves but mixed with
    the   people  of  Turkic  origin.   It  is  not  too
    difficult  to  imagine other Europeans  settling  in
    other Asian countries.  In Africa, European settlers
    have always been common.
    
    48.   The  implication is that Asian  may  not  mean
    Asian  any  more in the 21st Century.  The countries
    may  be of Asia but the peoples will be mixed,  with
    increasingly larger European minorities.  The  cross
    fertilisation of cultures will change the  character
    of Asia as it will change Europe and America.
    
    49.  The result will again be no monolithic Asia  to
    dominate the 21st Century.  Again there cannot be an
    Asian Century.
    
    50.  The Asian Century is a myth, a tantalising myth
    for  Asians, a scary myth for Europeans; but a  myth
    nevertheless.  No one should be flattered  by  myths
    nor should anyone be frightened by them.  Let us all
    forget  this Asian Century myth and settle  down  to
    make  the  World Trade Organisation  (WTO)  a  great
    organisation that will benefit rich and poor  alike;
    an    organisation   dedicated   to    international
    interdependence and friendship, free of arm-twisting
    and big-power dominance.  Our next enemy is still in
    Mars, struggling to evolve from a one-cell animal to
    something like the creatures we are familiar with on
    earth.   That  evolution will  take  a  few  million
    years,  as it did on earth.  We have ample  time  to
    prepare.    Let   us   prepare  for   that   distant
    eventuality  by  strengthening  the  earth   through
    mutual enrichment.  Let us now begin the creation of
    the Century of Planet Earth.

 
 



 
Google