Oleh/By		:	DATO' SERI DR. MAHATHIR BIN MOHAMAD 
Tempat/Venue 	: 	SUNWAY LAGOON RESORT HOTEL,
			PETALING JAYA, SELANGOR 
Tarikh/Date	: 	25/04/97 
Tajuk/Title  	: 	THE OXFORD ISLAMIC FORUM ON "THE 
			ISLAMIC WORLD AND GLOBAL 
			COOPERATION: PREPARING FOR THE 
			21ST CENTURY" 




   1.  I  feel  privileged  and honoured to be here today  to
  speak  at this Oxford Islamic Forum entitled `The  Islamic
  World  and  Global  Cooperation: Preparing  for  the  21st
  Century'.   I  hope  this topic will  generate  a  lot  of
  interest  and  discussions  as currently  there  are  many
  contrary views and debate on this subject.

  2.  Let me  start by looking  at the Islamic World itself.
  There  are at the moment not less than 56 countries  which
  are  members  of  the  Organisation of Islamic  Conference
  (OIC).   Not  all  these countries have Muslim  majorities
  and  fewer  still  officially accept Islam  as  the  state
  religion.  But Muslims are sufficiently influential as  to
  cause   the  Governments  of  these  countries   to   seek
  membership  of  the  Islamic community  of  nations.   All
  told,  Muslims  make  up  more than  one  billion  of  the
  world's  population.   But  they  are  far  from  being  a
  monolithic  group, being broken up as much  by  their  own
  loyalty  to their countries as they are by the differences
  in  their interpretations of Islam or indeed allegedly  by
  the degree of commitment to the faith.  They certainly  do
  not  make  up one cohesive Islamic civilisation which  can
  pose  a meaningful threat to other civilisations or indeed
  anyone.  They  are too busy fighting and undermining  each
  other to be a threat.

  3.  There  is also  not a single Muslim country  that  can
  be  classified  as developed.  A number are  very  wealthy
  being  well-endowed  with natural resources.   But  almost
  all  are lagging behind in modern knowledge, technological
  skills  and  in  many instances effective Government.   In
  fact  in  quite  a  few countries a state of  near-anarchy
  prevails.   By  no criteria can any of these countries  be
  classified as developed.

  4.  Poverty,  ignorance and  instability have become  such
  a  common feature in the Muslim nations that it is assumed
  this  is  a natural consequence of following the teachings
  of  Islam.  It is therefore not surprising that today  the
  world  associates  Islam with backwardness.   This  angers
  many  Muslims.  They think that it is an unfair judgement.
  They  are right of course.  It is unfair.  It is  not  due
  to  the teachings of Islam.  But the fact remains that the
  Muslim  nations  are  poor, are backward,  are  weak,  are
  disunited, are dependent on non-Muslims for all  kinds  of
  things  including  their own security  and  the  continued
  existence  of Islam itself.  With the powerful weapons  in
  the  hands of the non-Muslims it is entirely possible  for
  them  to wipe out the Muslims from the face of this earth.
  It  is only by the Grace of Allah Subhanahu wa Ta'ala  and
  His  mercy  that those whom we labelled as the enemies  of
  Islam  have not done so.  But the Muslims themselves  have
  done  nothing  to help themselves.  If at all,  they  have
  weakened  themselves  more  and  more  by  their  constant
  feuding   among   themselves,  by  their   confusing   and
  contradictory  interpretations  of  Islam  and  by   their
  failure  to  obey the injunctions to help themselves  even
  as they pray to Allah for His protection.

  5.  The  Quran  is  very clear on this.  Verse 79 Sura  IV
  An  Nisaa  stated that "Whatever good happens to  thee  is
  from  God  but whatever evil happens to thee is  from  thy
  soul."

  6.  That  Muslims  were  at  one time  the  most  advanced
  people  in  all fields is a fact of history.   Apart  from
  being  the  best strategists and warriors, they  were  the
  most  learned, the most enlightened and the  most  liberal
  of  the people in the world then.  It is difficult now  to
  think  of  Muslims as being enlightened and liberal.   But
  consider  the situation and the civilisation of Europe  in
  the  Middle ages.  What we now call the West was then  one
  of  the most backward communities of nations in the world.
  They  were  hopelessly superstitious that they banned  the
  sciences  as  witchcraft,  and  books  were  kept   locked
  because  knowledge  was  feared.   They  regularly   burnt
  witches  at  the stake.  Only the priests may  know  about
  their  religion and other subjects.  Since knowledge meant
  power  the priests ruled directly or indirectly  and  they
  imposed  a  reign  of terror through the  Inquisition  for
  centuries.   Such was the oppression by the  priests  that
  many    migrated,    seeking   freedom   from    Christian
  intolerance.

  7.  By  comparison with  the  Muslims of the  period,  the
  Europeans   were   indeed  primitive,  superstitious   and
  anything  but  liberal.  They were  certainly  feudal  and
  oppressive.   Their oppressive Governments led  their  own
  Christian subjects to welcome conquests by Muslims,  going
  so  far  as  to  abet in these conquests.  Even  the  Jews
  preferred  to  live  under  Muslim  rule  and  left  Spain
  together with the Muslims to settle in North Africa.   All
  these  must  indicate  the  tolerance  and  liberalism  of
  Muslims  and their Governments in the past, in  the  great
  days  of  the Muslim Empire.  Everything was not  rosy  of
  course.   There  were oppressive Muslim rulers  too.   But
  for  long  periods  non-Muslims in Muslim  countries  were
  free to go about their business and to practise their  own
  religions.

  8.  When  Islam  came  to  the Arabs over 1400  years  ago
  they   were   wallowing  in  superstition  and  ignorance.
  Living  in  the  arid and inhospitable desert,  forced  to
  wander  in  search of water and meagre pasture  for  their
  animals  and food for themselves, they had broken up  into
  a  number  of  feuding warring tribes.   Such  were  their
  feuds  that  for generations they would fight their  sworn
  tribal  enemies  even when the cause of their  enmity  had
  long been forgotten.

  9.  They  developed  their own codes of honour which  were
  at  once gracious  and  cruel.  They  would  be  the  most
  considerate  of hosts to strangers who seek  shelter  from
  them  and yet if they believe they had been slighted  they
  would  take  revenge  in  the most cruel  and  unforgiving
  manner.

  10.  For  these Arab tribes, the main cause of  shame  was
  always  their women.  They regarded women as mere chattel,
  as  property  to  use in exchange for  alliances,  as  the
  objects  of  their lusts.  Yet in their wars  they  always
  feared  capture  of their women by the enemy.   This  they
  regarded  as  most  dishonourable and  shameful  to  their
  family  and  their  tribe.  But in  order  to  avoid  this
  possibility  they  would rather kill  their  daughters  or
  sisters,  who may dishonour them or were likely  to  cause
  shame  to them.  And so it was their custom to bury  alive
  their  infant girls, to commit infanticide in  order  that
  the chances of being dishonoured later would be less.

  11.   They   were   inordinately  fond   of   praise   for
  themselves.   And so the beggars could always  expect  the
  rich  or  the  prominent to throw  their  coins  if  their
  praises were sung.  Flattery was the best way to win  them
  over always.

  12.  Their  superstitious fears  lead  them  to  attribute
  godly  powers to various objects of stone and  wood.   And
  they  would regularly visit the places where these objects
  were  kept  in order to offer sacrifices, including  human
  sacrifices, for their salvation, for protection  from  the
  unkind  elements  which  buffeted  them.   And  when   the
  feuding  tribes  met  during their pilgrimage  they  would
  fight and kill each other.

  13.  There  were  among  them  a  few  who  professed  the
  Christian  or  the  Jewish  faith,  who  believed  in  one
  Almighty  God,  who  were people of  the  book.   But  the
  ignorant Jahilliah Arabs preferred to believe in the  gods
  of  their  ancestors.  They rejected the messages  of  the
  apostles  who came before Muhammad although  it  is  clear
  that  they  knew of them.  That they knew of the Christian
  faith  is  clearly  shown when the Christian  Waraqah  was
  consulted about the voices heard by Muhammad.

  14.  This  then was the primitive, superstitious,  feuding
  people  and  tribes  to whom Muhammad was  sent  with  the
  message  of  Islam.   It  is  no  wonder  that  he   found
  difficulty  in  convincing them to give up  their  beliefs
  and  custom,  to  honour and save their women,  to  reject
  lust  and  the taking of innumerable wives, limiting  them
  to  only  four and even then only if they could do justice
  to  all four, which he pointed out they never could.   "Ye
  are  never  able to be fair and just as between  women"  -
  (Sura  IV  Verse 129).  And so they should take only  one.
  Knowing  their fondness for alcohol and the difficulty  in
  giving  up this vice, they were enjoined to forego alcohol
  little  by  little until it was forbidden  altogether.   A
  sudden  injunction  to stop alcohol would  not  have  been
  accepted by them.

  15.  They  were  instructed to befriend their  enemies  if
  the  latter  accepted the faith.  And under the leadership
  of  the Prophet they became united, forgetting their feuds
  and  their tribes.  This is clear from Verse 103  in  Sura
  III  Ali  Imran  "be  not divided among  yourselves.   And
  remember with gratitude God's favour on you; For  Ye  were
  enemies and He joined your hearts in love so that  by  His
  Grace, Ye became brethren."

  16.  In  Medina  their society was finally organised  with
  proper  laws  detailing crimes, the methods  of  judgement
  and  the punishments.  Always justice and quality of mercy
  was stressed.  Those who repented should be pardoned.

  17.  The  feuding,  barbaric tribes which  accepted  Islam
  united  and became a nation under the Medina constitution,
  the  first  written  constitution in  the  Islamic  world.
  Thus  was  the  core of the first Muslim  nation  created.
  From  Medina  the  prophet  sent  envoys  to  neighbouring
  countries  urging the rulers of these countries to  accept
  Islam.   The  prophet followed scrupulously the  teachings
  of  Islam in peace and in war.  No one should be forced to
  accept Islam.  This is made clear in Verse 256 of Sura  II
  Al-Baqarah "Let there be no compulsion in religion."

  18.  Unfortunately his followers were not so  patient  and
  ready  to tolerate the taunts and the opposition of  those
  who  rejected  the  teachings of the Prophet.   While  the
  Prophet  fought only defensive wars and was ever ready  to
  make  peace  and  enter into treaties to settle  disputes,
  his   disciples   were  more  aggressive,   believing   in
  spreading the faith through force of arms.  And so  within
  the  first  century  of the Hijrah the  definitive  Muslim
  Empire  was  conquered  largely  through  force  of  arms.
  While  the  conquests resulted in the spread of Islam  and
  the  enlargement of the Muslim Empire, they also  presaged
  the  trend  towards disregard for the teachings of  Islam.
  Anything and everything was accepted as legitimate if  the
  perpetrators invoke the interest of Islam.  And  so  today
  the  Greatness  of  Allah  is  often  proclaimed  as  some
  dastardly  act  is committed often against other  Muslims.
  Sura  II  Al-Baqarah - Verse 41 "Nor sell my signs  for  a
  small  price."   Again in Verse 224 "And  make  not  God's
  (name)  an  excuse."  Sura III Ali Imran  "They  will  not
  sell the Signs of God for a miserable sum".

  19.  Only  angels and the prophet could not  be  corrupted
  by  the  success of the Islamic enterprise.  Of  the  four
  enlightened  Caliphs who succeeded to  the  leadership  of
  the  Muslim Ummah, only Abu Bakar Assadik died  a  natural
  death.  The  other three, companions of the Prophet,  were
  killed by those envious of their position.  Clearly  there
  were  members  of  the Muslim ummah who  did  not  respect
  authority  as  enjoined by Islam.  They were  prepared  to
  assassinate  their  own  leaders,  something   the   Quran
  forbids.

  20.  By  the time of the fourth Caliph, Saidina  Ali,  the
  warring had become as serious as the tribal feuds  of  the
  old   pre-Islamic  Arabs.   The  Muslim  ummah  was  split
  permanently  into  two.   The opponents  of  Ali  followed
  Muawiyah  and  became  known  as  the  upholders  of   the
  traditions of the Prophet - Ahlul Sunnah Wal Jamaah.   The
  followers  of  Ali,  probably against the  wishes  of  Ali
  himself,  split off to form the Shiah Muslims,  venerating
  Ali as the true successor of the Prophet.

  21.  From  then  on each sect not only sought  to  justify
  itself  through numerous and contradictory interpretations
  of   the  teachings  of  Islam,  but  they  invented  many
  traditions  or sunnah of the Prophet in order  to  justify
  the   frequently  unIslamic  practices   in   which   they
  indulged.  So many were the traditions that  by  the  time
  Imam  Bukhari  studied  them  in  order  to  verify  their
  authenticity there were said to be 600,000  of  them.   Of
  these   Bukhari   verified  only  7000.   Other   scholars
  verified an even smaller number including a few which  had
  been  rejected by Bukhari.  Obviously there were more than
  590,000  false traditions which continue to be quoted  off
  and on to justify dubious Islamic practices.

  22.  As  the  empire grew many seek to inherit the  mantle
  of  Caliphs  and  Amir  ul  Mukminin.   Wars  were  fought
  between  Muslims as the different claimants  seek  worldly
  power.  Regional  Governors ignored the authority  of  the
  imperial Government in Medina,  Baghdad  or  Istanbul   as
  the  case  may   be. They began to rule independently,  to
  set up their own domain.

  23.  New  Islamic sects were founded and groups of  Muslim
  jurists  emerged  who  emphasised  the  supremacy  of  the
  Syariah  over the Quran even.  The tolerant and  forgiving
  nature  of Islam gave way to the rigid interpretations  of
  the  jurists  whose rulings could not be  disputed.   Only
  religious  subjects  were  allowed  to  be  studied.   The
  sciences,   mathematics  and  the  arts  were   not   only
  neglected   but   were  proscribed.    All   non-religious
  subjects  were labelled as unIslamic.  The vast  libraries
  fell  into neglect or were destroyed.  The Muslims  became
  more  and  more  ignorant even as the Christian  Europeans
  availed themselves of the writings of Muslim scholars  and
  progressed their Renaissance.  The decline of the  Muslims
  and their civilisation had begun in earnest.

  24.  Success  and power corrupted the Muslim  leaders  and
  deviations  from  the teachings of Islam became  more  and
  more  common.  This gave rise to reform movements intended
  to   bring  back  the  fundamental  practices  of   Islam.
  Caliphs  were  overthrown  and  new  Governments  set  up,
  principally by the Al-Murabitun (Almoravids) and then  the
  Al-Muwahhidun    from    North    Africa    and     Spain.
  Unfortunately,  the  reformist Governments  either  became
  corrupted  themselves or they interpreted  Islam  to  suit
  their  extremist views. Whatever, they too contributed  to
  the decline of the Muslims and their empire.  Weakened  by
  their narrow-minded interpretation of Islam, rejecting so-
  called  unIslamic  knowledge and  skills,  they  lost  the
  capacity to defend their territories in Spain.

  25.  Finally in 1492, Grenada the last bastion  of  Muslim
  Spain,  fell to the armies of Ferdinand and Isabella.   Bo
  Abdul,  the King who never led his army on the battlefield
  was  forced  to  surrender and departed for North  Africa.
  The  Muslims  remaining behind were eventually  forced  to
  forsake  their  religion or face death.   Thus  ended  the
  last Muslim enclave in Western Europe.

  26.  But  the Europeans were not about to leave the  North
  African   Muslim  states  in  peace.   France  and   Spain
  extended their domain to the Magreb and eventually all  of
  Arab  North  Africa  from  Egypt  to  Morocco  fell  under
  European rule.

  27.  However, even as Muslim Spain ceased to exist,  Turks
  began  to  expand  and build a new Muslim Empire.  Turkish
  armies  conquered most of the Balkan and actually  knocked
  at  the  Gates  of  Vienna.   The  Mediterranean  Sea  was
  dominated by Turkish naval forces, regular and irregular.

  28.  But  the  courts of the Turkish Sultans  soon  became
  corrupted  by their wealth and their love of luxury.   The
  Sultans  no longer led their armies into battle, nor  were
  the  armies made up of Turkish soldiers.  The children  of
  Christian  citizens  were  recruited  and  brought  up  as
  Muslims  and  trained as professional soldiers.   In  time
  these  Yeniceri  or  Janisaries came to  dominate  Turkish
  politics and engineered several palace coups.

  29.  The  religious advisers of the Turkish  Sultans  were
  sycophants  who  readily approved everything  the  Sultans
  did.   Thus  huge  harems were maintained to  satisfy  the
  lusts  of the Sultans, and the brothers of newly enthroned
  Sultans  were  all murdered in order to  ensure  that  the
  Sultan would not be challenged.

  30.   While  these  practices  were  approved   and   even
  encouraged  by  the  religious  authorities,  attempts  at
  modernising  the armed forces were opposed  as  unIslamic.
  When proposals were made to change the baggy trousers  for
  less  clumsy  pants  and the fez replaced  by  peak  caps,
  there was mutiny in the armed forces.

  31.  In  the end the formerly invincible Turkish army  was
  armed  with  obsolete weapons and was  no  match  for  the
  disciplined,  professional European forces, equipped  with
  ever  more effective weapons.  Beginning with the  failure
  to  capture  Vienna, the Turkish Empire began to  decline.
  The  process seemed inexorable.  By the end of  the  First
  World  War  the  Turkish  Empire  had  broken  up  into  a
  multiplicity  of  little states all of  which  came  under
  French  or British overlordship.  Turkey itself was almost
  lost to the Greeks but for Mustafa Kamal.

  32.  The  Muslims who emerged from the Arabian  Peninsular
  were  initially true adherents of the teachings of  Islam.
  They  were  tolerant of the people of the book,  and  were
  broadminded  and willing enough to learn the  skills,  the
  sciences,  mathematics and the arts  of  the  non-Muslims,
  particularly those of the ancient Greeks.  They did  their
  own  research  and  contributed greatly  to  the  body  of
  knowledge  in  many  fields.  They became  technologically
  advanced as a result.

  33.  Unfortunately, with the advent of the Muslim  jurists
  and  the  so-called reformists, studies other  than  those
  specifically  related to religion and its  practices  were
  frowned  upon  and eventually proscribed.  With  this  the
  Muslims   regressed.   True,  it  was   the   abuses   and
  deviations  from  the  teachings and practices  of  Islam,
  particularly by the elites which brought about the  reform
  movements  and the ascendency of the Muslim jurists.   But
  what  was  achieved was not a return to the true teachings
  of  Islam.   The  reforming fanatics  and  jurists  simply
  wanted an Islam that was more rigid in the observation  of
  certain  practices  and rituals while precluding  anything
  that  they considered as unIslamic.  And so not  only  did
  they  proscribe so-called non-Islamic knowledge, but  they
  considered  anything that did not seem to have  originated
  in  the  Muslim  past  as unIslamic  as  well.   Thus  the
  modernisation   of   the  Turkish  army   was   considered
  unIslamic.  They ignored the injunction in the Quran  that
  the  Muslims must always be prepared to defend themselves.
  Instead  they clung to the form rather than the  substance
  of  the  teaching.  It was more important  to  relive  the
  past than to consider the present.

  34.  The  Quran  speaks in parables, the real  meaning  of
  which  must be interpreted in the context of the situation
  faced   by   the   Ummah  through  the  ages.   But   most
  interpreters  insist on the literal meaning of  the  words
  in  the  Quran. And so the defense of the Ummah  lost  its
  importance  to the need for `steeds of war' as  stated  in
  Sura  VIII (Anfal) Verse 60 "Against them make ready  your
  strength  to  the utmost of your power, including  `steeds
  of war', to strike terror to the enemies".

  35.  It is a fact that once upon a time there was a  great
  Muslim empire.  It is also a fact that that empire  is  no
  more.   Defeats in the fields of battle and in the conduct
  of  diplomatic relations had not only whittled the  empire
  down  but had broken up the Empire into ineffective Muslim
  states  which  for  a  period of time became  colonies  of
  Western  powers.   The fragmentation and  colonisation  of
  the  Muslim  world is no doubt due to the machinations  of
  the  Europeans  and  their military  power.   It  was  the
  Europeans  who manoeuvred the Arabs into fighting  against
  the Turks for their independence.

  36.  Muslims  all over the world often talk  longingly  of
  the  Empire  they  had lost, of their past  greatness,  of
  their  domination of the world.  They had ruled Spain  for
  800  years  and  much  of Eastern Europe  for  almost  400
  years.  They  even  talk  of their  past  mastery  of  the
  sciences, mathematics and the arts, their past prowess  in
  battles  and their victories.  They point to the artifacts
  of  their past glory, the astrolabe, the armour and swords
  of  their  past commanders such as Salah el Din  Al  Ayubi
  and  the great architectural tributes to their engineering
  and  construction  skills  as evidence  of  their  worldly
  achievements.

  37.  And  then  they think of the reality of the  present.
  They  and their nations are backward, disunited, weak  and
  are  pawns in the political games of the Europeans.   They
  are   powerless  to  help  Muslims  when  they  are  being
  slaughtered  by  their  enemies.   They  see  their   holy
  Palestine  divided and given to their sworn  enemies,  the
  Jews.   Their  initial belief that they could defeat  tiny
  Israel  proved  unfounded.   The  Israelis  defeated  them
  again and again, aided and abetted by the Europeans.

  38.  Not  only  is  the  Empire gone but  whatever  little
  respect  and honour that they had is now gone.   They  are
  openly  caricatured as bumbling incompetents whose chances
  of  recovering  past  greatness will forever  remain  pipe
  dreams.

  39.  And  the more they think of their parlous state,  the
  more  angry they become.  Frustrated, they feed  on  their
  anger,  frequently  getting themselves  into  a  state  of
  frenzy.    And   like   most  angry  people   they   react
  irrationally.   They  resort  to  acts  which  gain   them
  nothing  at all except to intensify the hatred others  had
  for them.

  40.  Terrorism  was  not invented  by  the  Muslims.   The
  first  hijacking of aircraft was by an American.  But  the
  Muslims  learnt  this quickly enough  as  they  did  other
  terrorist acts.  Soon terrorism, the invention of the non-
  Muslims,  became  synonymous with Islam and  the  Muslims.
  Far  from being ashamed for giving them and their religion
  a  bad name, the Muslim extremists went on to commit  more
  frightening crimes.  They would think nothing  of  killing
  the  children  of their enemies in order to strike  terror
  in  the  hearts of their tormentors.  But their acts  have
  availed  them  of nothing except the increased  hatred  of
  their  enemies, who retaliated with equal  ferocity.   And
  this  increased  the  anger  of  the  Muslims  even  more,
  driving them into committing worse acts.

  41.  It  would seem that for some extremist Muslim winning
  their   fight  or  achieving  their  objective   are   not
  important,  not  relevant.  It is the fight  that  counts.
  The  more they create hatred for themselves, the more will
  they  be  condemned and abused, and the  greater  will  be
  their  hatred for their enemies.  And the more  determined
  will they be to continue the fight against their enemies.

  42.  One is again reminded of the tribal feuds of the pre-
  Islamic  days.   There was no objective, only  hatred  for
  the  enemy tribe.  And so they mount fights and  kill  for
  generations without seeking settlement or even victory.

  43.  For  as long as the obsession with hurting the  enemy
  prevails,  for  so  long  will  the  Muslims  fight  their
  enemies.   There  will be no peace for peace  is  not  the
  objective.  The only end is the total destruction  of  the
  enemy.   That  this is not likely to happen is irrelevant.
  The  important  thing  is  that  enemies  must  be  fought
  against, irrespective of the result.

  44.  But  is this in accord with the teachings  of  Islam?
  True  in  Verse 190 of Sura II the Muslims  are  urged  to
  "Fight  in  the cause of God those who fight you"  and  in
  the  next  Verse "And slay them wherever you  catch  them,
  and  turn  them out from where they have Turned you  out".
  But  immediately following this Verse Muslims are told  by
  the  Quran  (Verse  192) "But if they cease,  God  is  of-
  forviging, Most Merciful".

  45.  And again in Verse 193 "But if they cease, Let  there
  be   no   hostility,   Except  to   those   who   practise
  oppression".   (And  we  know  who  practises   oppression
  today).

  46.  But  despite these Verse 194 says- "But fear God  and
  know that God is with those Who restrain themselves".

  47.  It  is  natural for the Muslims to yearn after  their
  past greatness, their Empire and their dominance over  the
  rest  of  the  world.  But they must know that Imperialism
  is  a  thing of the past.  Neither the Muslim Empire,  nor
  the British Empire, no any Empire can be resurrected.

  48.  All  that we can hope to aspire to is the development
  of  independent  Muslim countries  to  the  level  of  the
  developed  countries  of  the  world.   This  is  not   an
  impossible task.  Muslims are not created by Allah  to  be
  inferior.  Indeed the opposite seems true if past  history
  is  anything  to  go  by.  If they want  to,  Muslims  can
  master all the skills and technologies now monopolised  by
  non-Muslims.   If they want to, Muslims can  govern  their
  countries  well and effectively.  But they must decide  to
  do  this,  decide that Allah created this world  for  them
  too,  and  that it is their duty to show that Islam  is  a
  great  religion  which can bring greatness  to  those  who
  profess and practise it.

  49.  The  Quran  says in Verse 11 of Sura  XIII.   "Verily
  never  will  God  change the condition of a  people  until
  they  change it themselves."  Again it must be  remembered
  that  "Whatever  good  comes to  thee  is  from  God;  but
  whatever  evil happens to thee, is from thy  soul".   Sura
  IV Verse 79.

  50.  They  can  develop their different countries  to  the
  desired  level without attempting to come together  as  an
  empire.  Of course they must cooperate with each other  as
  they  are all members of the Muslim Ummah.  Their  loyalty
  to  their own country should not extend to warring against
  other  Muslim  nations purely due to  national  ambitions.
  They  can  strengthen  the OIC and  help  the  members  in
  distress.   But  that  is  as  far  as  they  should   go.
  Coordination and cooperation, but no Empire.

  51.  The  Muslim  countries  --  independent,  strong  and
  developed   --  must take their places as members  of  the
  World  Community of nations.  They must remain  Muslim  of
  course and they must uphold Islam.  But they must be  true
  Muslim  fundamentalists - i.e. they must do what is  right
  and  reject  what is wrong.  The Quran says  in  Sura  III
  Verse  104, "Let there arise out of you a band  of  people
  inviting to all that is good, enjoining what is right  and
  forbidding  what is wrong."  Islam has always upheld  what
  is  right  and  just.  Islam has never advocated  that  we
  should  plot or support each other in doing what is wrong.
  And  so  if  Muslims do what is wrong, other Muslims  must
  condemn  it.   And they must condemn even if  the  victims
  are  not  Muslims.   For the Quran enjoins  "let  not  the
  hatred of others make you swerve to wrong and depart  from
  justice"  (Sura V Verse 9).  Sura V Verse 45 stresses  "If
  thou  judge, judge in equity between them, for God  loveth
  those who judge in equity".

  52.  In  this  modern world Muslims have a  real  mission.
  They  must bring back the spiritual values to a world that
  is  fast becoming Godless and thoroughly materialistic; so
  arrogant  that  it  thinks it knows  all  the  answers  to
  everything; a world which will develop the ultimate  means
  of  destruction and place it in the hands of irresponsible
  and insane individuals; a world tittering on the brink  of
  a Man-made Apocalypse.

  53.  These people think that they know enough to play  God
  Himself.   Already they believe they can  create  anything
  that  God  creates.   They  may want  to  create  a  world
  according   to  their  wishes.   And  they   have   become
  insufferably  arrogant, accepting no one as being  greater
  than them.

  54.  They  forget  that  for  all  their  brilliance  they
  cannot answer the question "why".  They cannot answer  why
  there  is life in the world, why there is a universe,  why
  matter  acts  in the way it does, why oxygen and  hydrogen
  form  water  and  a myriad other chemical   and   physical
  reactions.  They may know how all those things happen  but
  never why.  They are not the genius they think they are.

  55.  And because the human race is becoming more and  more
  arrogant,  religion and spiritual values are  needed  even
  more.   And  Islam  can provide the spiritual  values,  to
  those who believe and to those who don't.  The Islam  that
  can  provide these values is fundamental Islam, the  truly
  fundamental  Islam  which  advocates  peace,  charity  and
  caring,  not the Islam which commits crimes and calls  out
  the name of Allah to justify it.

  56.  The  21st Century is not relevant to the Muslims.  It
  is  just a period in time.  But the 21st Century will  see
  many  changes  and the Muslims will be  a  part  of  these
  changes  whether they like it or not.  It  is  better  for
  them  to  face the 21st Century with their eyes wide  open
  and  with a clear vision of what they want to do  and  the
  role  they  wish  to play.  And if they chose  to  play  a
  constructive  role  while  retaining  their  faith,  their
  spiritual  values and their true brotherhood,  they  would
  be  able  to  contribute positively to the development  of
  mankind,  to put it on an even keel again and  to  prevent
  the  self-destruct course which the human race appears  to
  be  heading  for.   The Muslims can be a force  for  human
  good  in the 21st Century.  F

 
 



 
Google