Oleh/By		:	DATO' SERI DR. 	
			MAHATHIR BIN MOHAMAD 
Tempat/Venue 	: 	ZIMBABWE 
Tarikh/Date 	: 	04/10/99 
Tajuk/Title  	: 	THE SMART PARTNERSHIP DINNER 
			IN VICTORIA FALLS 



                 
    "MALAYSIA'S EXPERIENCE IN MANAGING ECONOMIC RECOVERY
   WHILE SAFEGUARDING THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC RESPONSIBILITIES"
  
  
  
       In  July  last year at Swakopmund, President  Thabo
  Mbeki  (he  was not President yet at that time)  in  his
  speech "Stop the Laughter" called me a rebel.
  
  2.    I had always thought of rebels as people with guns
  who fight against Governments.  I was and I am still  in
  the  Government of my country - so I could't be fighting
  against myself.
  
  3.    But  President  Mbeki  labelled  me  a  rebel  not
  because   I  shoot  at  my  Government  but  because   I
  "challenge   the   orthodoxies   of   modern    economic
   dialogue".   I  feel  honoured  that  by  doing  this  I
  qualify  as a rebel.  In Malaysia the shooting  is  over
  but rebellion against orthodoxy is still possible.
  
  4.    My  talk  tonight is about that kind of rebellion.
  I  would  like to warn you that this rebellion  is  very
  dull.  So I hope you will bear with me.
  
  5.    I  believe  you are all aware that Malaysia  is  a
  multiracial   country.   More  than  that   the   racial
  differences  are heightened because the different  races
  believe  in different religions, the indigenous  Malays,
  the   biggest   group  are  Muslims,  the  Chinese   are
  Buddhists, and the Indians are Hindus.  These  religions
  are usually incompatible.
  
  6.    But  to  make matters worse their  shares  of  the
  wealth  of  the country are also linked to their  racial
  origins.  The indigenous Malays are the poorest,  owning
  only  one percent of the economic wealth when we  gained
  independence,  the Chinese and Indians had  30  percent,
   the rest being with the British and other expatriates.
  
  7.    Despite  these differences the three  major  races
  managed to work together to obtain independence.   There
  was  a kind of social contract in which, in exchange for
  citizenship  for  most of the Chinese and  Indians,  the
  Malays  should  have a bigger portion  of  the  economic
  wealth.
  
  8.    A  decade into independence it became obvious that
  the  indigenous people were not getting a fair share  of
  the  wealth.   They  began to condemn  Chinese  economic
  domination.   Tension rose and in 1969 race riots  broke
  out  in  Kuala Lumpur following an acrimonious  election
  campaign.   More  than  100 people  were  killed,  motor
  vehicles and buildings were razed to the ground.
  9.    The  Government  declared an emergency,  suspended
  Parliament  and  quickly put a stop to the  riots.   But
  the  Government also studied the causes  of  the  racial
  animosities and decided that the Malays must be given  a
   greater  share of the economic wealth while the  Chinese
  and  Indians should be given bigger participation in the
  Government.
  
  10.   An  affirmative action programme was initiated  to
  bring   the   indigenous  people   into   the   economic
  mainstream  while  the Government invited  more  Chinese
  and  Indians,  largely  from the opposition  parties  to
  join the Government.
  
  11.   The  scheme worked out so well that racial tension
  was   practically  eliminated  and  Malaysians   enjoyed
  almost  three decades of stability and economic  growth.
  So  successful  was  the handling of race  relations  in
  Malaysia  that even the recent recession caused  by  the
  currency  devaluation  and the  collapse  of  the  share
  market  failed  to  spark  racial  fights  as  they  did
  elsewhere in Southeast Asia.
  
  12.   But  the attacks on Malaysia's currency and  share
  markets   nevertheless  damaged  the  carefully  planned
  redistribution of economic wealth.  The still young  and
   friable  indigenous  business  community  suffered   the
  most.   If  the economy is not resuscitated quickly  and
  put  back  on  the growth path, racial antagonism  would
  return and Malaysia would be politically unstable.   And
  political  instability  in  turn  would  make   economic
  revival difficult.
  
  13.   The Government is acutely aware of this danger  of
  racial   tensions,   riots  and   consequent   political
  instability  recurring and have to resolve the  economic
  problems   caused  by  currency  and  share  devaluation
  without disturbing the delicate balance in term of  race
  relations.
  
  14.    Other  countries  faced  with  economic   turmoil
  quickly  resorted  to IMF help.  Unfortunately  the  IMF
  wants to use the loans given by it to force through  its
  so-called  economic  reforms.  For the  IMF  affirmative
  action,  the  active  Government  intervention  in   the
  distribution  of  economic  wealth  between  races,   is
  unacceptable.   The economy must be completely  free  of
   Government interference and furthermore it must be  open
  to total and unrestricted foreign participation.
  
  15.   The  result  would  be to deprive  the  indigenous
  people  in  particular of their share  in  the  business
  sector and the wealth accruing from it.  The Chinese  on
  the  other hand might still retain or even enhance their
  share.
  
  16.   The  IMF  solution is therefore not for  Malaysia.
  We   have  to  devise  our  own  solution  so  that  the
  Government can continue with the eradication of  poverty
  among  all  races and elimination of the  identification
  of  race  with  economic function -  the  so-called  New
  Economic  Policy  which  had so successfully  created  a
  stable and prosperous Malaysia.
  
  17.   To  restore the economy in the face of attacks  by
  currency  traders  and  share market  manipulators,  the
  Government  set up the National Economic Action  Council
  (NEAC).   The NEAC studied the impact of the devaluation
  on  the  economy and came up with numerous proposals  on
   resuscitating  the economy.  The banking  and  corporate
  sectors  had to be reformed so as to be more  resilient.
  Imports  were  curtailed while exports were  stimulated.
  Consumption of imported sugar, milk and wheat flour  was
  reduced.   Price control was fully enforced  to  prevent
  undue  inflation.  Retail prices of food and goods  were
  monitored closely so as to ensure no profiteering  takes
  place.   The retrenchment and unemployment figures  were
  scrutinised for sign of recession.
  
  18.   Statutory  reserves of banks  which  stood  at  13
  percent  were reduced by four percent to improve banking
  liquidity.   Hire-purchase  terms  were  also  improved.
  Property,   vehicles  and  retail  sales  were   boosted
  through   foregoing   taxes  during  Government-endorsed
  sales  carnivals.   Studies were made  to  improve  food
  production  as the biggest import item for  the  country
  is food.
  
  19.   The  performance of the Stock Market and  invidual
  companies were also studied so as to know the effect  of
   the downturn on them and to help them if necessary.   An
  asset  management company was set up to  buy  over  Non-
  Performing  Loans in order to relieve the banks  and  to
  help  the companies to turn around.  A company was  also
  set up to refinance banks.
  
  20.   Mergers  of  banks and of stock broking  companies
  were encouraged.
  
  21.    Sources   of  funds  within  the   country   were
  identified  and  assessed so as to reduce  the  need  to
  raise  funds  abroad.  Malaysia has one of  the  highest
  savings rates in the world i.e. 40 percent.  This  money
  could  of  course be put to better use so as to maximise
  returns.   In  the end it was found that domestic  funds
  were  sufficient to finance much of the recovery process
  and borrowing abroad became less urgent.
  
  22.   Many  more studies and actions were undertaken  so
  as  to  minimise the impact of currency devaluation  and
  the  fall in share prices.  However despite all that was
  done  or  could be done, the devaluation of the currency
   and  stock-market's near collapse placed the country  in
  a  very  difficult  position.  In all the  country  lost
  about  50  billion  US  Dollars in terms  of  purchasing
  power  of  imports and 150 billion US Dollars in  market
  capitalisation.   If the currency devalued  further  the
  economy could be so weakened that we would have to  turn
  to the IMF and accept its terms.
  
  23.   A solution had to be found which would protect the
  country  from the rapacious currency traders  and  stock
  market   manipulators.   Malaysia  actually   had   some
  experience in currency trading.  In the early  80's  the
  Central  Bank  traded extensively in the  currencies  of
  Europe, America and Japan.  It was pure speculation  and
  the  funds  available  were not  adequate  to  move  the
  market.   In  the end Malaysia lost a lot of  money  and
  decided  to get out of the business.  But the  knowledge
  gained was useful nevertheless.
  
  24.   Malaysia studied the mechanism of currency trading
   thoroughly.    It   became   obvious   that   the   free
  convertibility  of  the  local  currency,  the  Ringgit,
  which  facilitate trade is also the Achilles heel  which
  exposed us to the attacks of currency traders.  We  have
  to  stop the free convertibility of the Ringgit  and  to
  reassert  the  sovereignty of the  Government  over  our
  currency.
  
  
  25.    Apparently  no  cash  is  involved  in   currency
  trading.   When money is sold or bought the  figures  on
  the  bank's  computers  move  and  the  buyer  gets  the
  figures  representing the amount of  money  credited  to
  him.   Since  the  money is only  legal  tender  in  the
  issuing  country, the actual money is held in  banks  in
  the  issuing  country.  The foreign bank would  instruct
  the  domestic  bank to credit the money to  the  buyer's
  account.   Clearly the buyer can only have the money  if
  the domestic bank credits it to his account.
  
  26.   To stop the trade in currency the local banks were
   instructed  by  the  Central Bank not  to  transfer  any
  foreign-owned  Ringgit held by foreigners except  during
  the  first month of the control.  Effectively this  made
  the   foreign-owned  Ringgit  worthless  unless  it   is
  transfered  to  a  local account  in  the  first  month.
  After that no more transfers would be allowed.
  
  27.   Thus  money belonging to foreigners held in  their
  accounts  in domestic banks would be useless  after  one
  month  if  it  is  not  already transfered.   If  it  is
  transfered  it  means that foreign-owned Ringgits  would
  have  been repatriated and would be available for  banks
  to  lend.  Billions of Ringgits were repatriated in this
  way.   Once  repatriated it cannot be taken out  of  the
  country  again  as  it would not be allowed  to  return.
  Taking  out  the Ringgit would render it useless  as  it
  cannot  be  legal tender in any other country.   And  no
  one would accept it in exchange for other currencies.
  
  28.   This means no Ringgits would be available  outside
   the  country  for currency traders to borrow  and  sell.
  Trading  in  the Ringgit stopped and the Government  was
  then  able to fix the exchange rate within the  country.
  Anyone  needing foreign currency to pay for imports  can
  change  their  Ringgits  for  foreign  currency  at  the
  Central  Bank  or  agent banks.  On the  other  hand  if
  exporters  earn  foreign currency they  can  change  for
  Malaysian  Ringgit at the Government fixed rate  at  the
  Central  Bank  or authorised bank.  All  the  while  the
  Government would keep track of all incoming or  outgoing
  money in whatever currency.
  
  29.   Had  the  Government fixed a  high  rate  for  the
  Ringgit,  exports would be costly and there would  be  a
  black  market  in foreign currencies.   A  low  exchange
  rate  would  make  import  more  costly  and  result  in
  inflation.  The Government fixed a rate that is  neither
  too high nor too low.
  
  30.   Once  the  rate  is fixed businesses  can  operate
  without the uncertainties of fluctuating exchange  rates
   and  the  need to hedge.  The return of all the Ringgits
  from  abroad  meant the banks have plenty  of  money  to
  lend.    Interest  rates  could  therefore  be   reduced
  without  fear of traders devaluing the currency further.
  Businesses  could  borrow and could  repay  loans.   The
  rapid  rise  in   Non  Performing  Loans  was  reversed.
  Debtors became solvent and could borrow again.
  
  31.   To  recover fully the slide in the price of shares
  must   also   be  stopped.   Initially,  the  Government
  disallowed  short-selling  on  the  Kuala  Lumpur  Stock
  Exchange.   But the short-selling went on  as  Singapore
  had  opened  a  market in Malaysian shares  without  the
  consent of the Malaysian Government.  They were able  to
  continue   short-selling  and  consequently  the   share
  prices kept on dropping.  As a result our companies  and
  banks  were  in distress as margin calls  could  not  be
  met, and debts could not be paid.
  
  
  32.   Malaysia  had  to stop the operation  of  the  so-
   called  Central Limit Order Book (CLOB) in Singapore  in
  order  to  make  currency control effective.   To  avoid
  reporting  changes in ownership of shares through  sales
  on  the CLOB, all shares were registered in the name  of
  nominee  companies on the Malaysian Stock Exchange.   We
  could  not  track the transactions on the  CLOB  and  so
  short-selling went on, depressing our share prices.
  
  33.   To  stop CLOB we made it necessary for all  shares
  to   be   registered  directly  in  the  name   of   the
  substantive owner.  Transactions not so registered  will
  not   be  legal  and  recognised.   Nominees  were   not
  recognised.   Trade on the CLOB stopped immediately  and
  the Composite Index of the KLSE climbed rapidly.  It  is
  now  almost  150  percent  higher  than  when  CLOB  was
  operating.
  
  34.   We also stopped repatriation of the proceeds  from
  the  sale of shares on the KLSE for one year.   Thus  we
  stopped  the  possible  sudden  massive  withdrawal   of
   capital  from  the KLSE by the foreign  investors  which
  would  have  caused a severe plunge  in  the  index  and
  serious loss of market capitalisation.
  
  35.   It  was believed that when one year was  up  there
  would  be a massive outflow of capital.  But so good  is
  the  performance of the Malaysian economy after controls
  that  when  the  year was up there  was  only  a  little
  outflow.  The stock market remained sound and the  banks
  and  companies  were released from the pressure  of  bad
  loans.   Besides, the asset management company  and  the
  bank recapitalisation exercise helped the banks and  the
  companies to deal with their non-performing loans.
  
  36.   The efforts to revive the economy did not end with
  the  stoppage  of  currency trading  and  shares  short-
  selling.   As  I pointed out numerous other  steps  were
  taken  to  bring  back  the growth  performance  of  the
  Malaysian  economy.  But the most important  steps  were
  the  frustrating  of  Currency Traders  and  the  short-
   selling on the CLOB.
  
  37.   Once  selective control of capital flows were  put
  in  place  the effect was quite dramatic and  immediate.
  The  Executive  Committee of the NEAC watched  the  data
  daily,  and  what we saw was very encouraging.   Firstly
  the  foreign reserves went up rapidly until  it  is  now
  about  32 billion US Dollars against 20 billion when  we
  started.   Loans  given out by banks  picked  up  fairly
  well;    vehicle   and   property   sales    went    up,
  infrastructure  work started again.  The contraction  of
  the  GDP  slowed down and we achieved a  growth  of  4.1
  percent  in the 2nd Quarter of 1999.  We are  on  target
  to  achieve one percent growth in 1999 although  various
  experts predict a bigger growth of up to four percent.
  
  38.   The  Stock  Market index rose from 262  points  on
  September 1st 1998 to over 800 at one time.  It has  now
  come  down  to around 700, relieving both the banks  and
  the companies of much of the NPL.
   
  39.   While  most  of the indicators are  positive,  the
  economic  turmoil  precipitated by the currency  traders
  and  stock  market manipulators destroyed  much  of  our
  achievement  in  correcting the  imbalance  between  the
  economic  performance  of  our  multiracial  population.
  While  everyone was hit by the downturn, the  indigenous
  businessmen  were hit most badly.  The big  corporations
  they  had  successfully set up were unable to  withstand
  the  burden of debts they carried.  They were forced  to
  sell  off  to  the  non-indigenous people  and  this  of
  course   undid  much  of  the  redistribution   we   had
  achieved.   The indigenous middle class, small  compared
  to  the  non-indigenous, practically  disappeared.   And
  once again we find the indigenous people only among  the
  low-paid workers, hawkers and petty traders.
  
  40.   Now we have to start all over again and it is  not
  going  to  be easy.  Already our affirmative action  has
  been  labelled  cronyism.   To  our  foreign  detractors
   affirmative action only benefits the family and  friends
  of  the  members  of the Government, in  particular  the
  Prime Minister.  Explanations given to prove that it  is
  not  so  have been totally ignored.  The Western  press,
  the  IMF  and  other  agencies  in  the  West  kept   on
  repeating  that  our  New Economic  Policy  directed  at
  restructuring our multiracial society benefits only  the
  rich friends and families of the Government members.
  
  41.   Yet  in  truth  the New Economic  Policy  benefits
  every  single indigenous people and even a  fair  number
  of  non-indigenous people.  Obviously the policy  cannot
  make  everyone  of  these deprived people  millionaires.
  They  benefit  according to their own capability.   Thus
  although   everyone   could  get  free   education   and
  scholarships  some could not progress  beyond  secondary
  schools,  while  others could go to the universities  at
  home  and abroad.  Others went into business as a result
  of  the  opportunities, licences, premises  and  capital
   made  available  by  the Government.   Some  could  only
  manage  small  businesses  while  others  went  out   to
  acquire  and manage billion-dollar enterprises and  were
  even  able  to  venture  abroad.  That  some  indigenous
  businessmen could rise to such levels depended on  their
  abilities.   Opportunities are created by the Government
  for  all  but obviously not everyone would  be  able  to
  avail themselves of these opportunities and profit  from
  them.
  
  42.    But  the  foreign  detractors  and  their   local
  supporters  see  everyone of the  successful  indigenous
  businessmen as cronies of the Government.  That many  of
  these  people  failed miserably and some  of  them  were
  actually  members of the families of Government  members
  or  their  friends is ignored.  Those who succeed   were
  all  regarded as cronies and families of the  Government
  members.   Even members and strong well-known supporters
  of  the  opposition were regarded as cronies or families
   of  the  Government members if they  succeed.   If  they
  fail then they are not.
  
  43.   Because  the affirmative action had produced  very
  successful    and   therefore   very   rich   indigenous
  businessmen and they were alleged to be cronies  of  the
  Government,   the  foreigners  demand  that  affirmative
  action   should   be   stopped.    This   would   create
  disparities  between the races as among  the  very  rich
  and  successful  there would not be a single  indigenous
  person.
  
  44.   The real reason for foreign dislike of affirmative
  action   is   because  most  of  the  highly  profitable
  privatised    projects   went    to    the    indigenous
  entrepreneurs  in order to balance the surfeit  of  very
  rich  and  very successful non-indigenous entrepreneurs.
  This  policy  cuts off the foreigners from  getting  the
  privatised  projects  for  themselves.   And  these  are
  areas which they are particularly interested in as  they
  aim  to  monopolise them worldwide.  The  impoverishment
   and  subsequent  submission of the country  to  the  IMF
  would  have  provided  the foreign companies  with  this
  opportunity.   But  the  Malaysian  Government  has  not
  submitted  to  the IMF.  We are under no  obligation  to
  jettison   our  New  Economic  Policy,  our  affirmative
  action programme.
  
  
  45.   Economic  management of the country is  not  about
  enriching  it  only.   A country  can  be  made  wealthy
  without  the  wealth being evenly distributed.   It  was
  the  extreme disparity between rich and poor in the  old
  Capitalist  system that brought about the Socialist  and
  Communist revolution.
  
  46.   In Malaysia it would have been easy to give a free
  hand  to  the  very dynamic and business  oriented  non-
  indigenous  Chinese Malaysian to develop and enrich  the
  country.   But  then the indigenous people would  remain
  poor  and  have a sense of deprivation.  They  would  be
  bitter  and  angry  and would rise against  people  whom
  they  would  regard as foreigners who had stolen  wealth
   that  rightly belongs to them.  They would  destroy  the
  wealth  which  had  been created and the  country  would
  fail  to  develop.  In the end everyone would  lose  and
  the  country  would  have to beg  for  foreign  aid  and
  accept the conditions imposed.
  
  47.   After  our  traumatic race riots  in  1969  we  in
  Malaysia  are  determined to have  growth  with  equity.
  Our  New  Economic  Policy was successful  in  achieving
  this.   We are not about to give up this formula  simply
  because  the IMF and the Western media think  we  should
  do  so.  Our growth had not been stunted because we  had
  a  political  and social agenda intricately  bound  with
  our  economic agenda.  We think we can continue to  grow
  with  equity by adhering to the objectives  of  our  New
  Economic  Policy, now that we have been able  to  defeat
  the   attempt  to  destroy  our  economy  and  political
  independence    by    devaluing   our    currency    and
  impoverishing us.
                              
      

 
 



 
Google