Oleh 		: 	DATO SERI DR MAHATHIR BIN MOHAMAD 
Tempat		: 	SUNWAY LAGOON RESORT
			HOTEL PETALING JAYA 
Tarikh		: 	17-10-2000 
Tajuk 		: 	THE OFFICIAL OPENING OF K-ECONOMY 
			CONFERENCE
Penyampai	: 	PM



                    " E-MIGRATION -
  RISING TO THE CHALLENGES OF THE NEW ECONOMIC FRONTIER "
  
  
  
       I  am  sure you are all aware of how little I  know
  about  economics.  However, as  both  the  International
  Monetary  Fund  and  Mr  Soros  have  admitted  that   I
  actually  know  something about it,  perhaps  I  may  be
  allowed  to  share a few thoughts with you on  Knowledge
  or K-Economy.
       
  2.   I believe many of us are still suspicious of new terms
  like  "The  K-Economy".  It sounds so "airy  fairy",  so
  impossibly vague.  Perhaps, even now, there are those who
   regard it in the same way as they regard ghosts. They hope
  it will go away and bother someone else.
  
  3.   So how "real" is this knowledge economy? It is real for
  the  graphs  show  that productivity growth  doubled  in
  knowledge-rich  economies. It is real  because  the  way
  countries with flourishing knowledge-based economies have
  leapt ahead in world competitive rankings.  Obviously since
  it is real we will have to do something about it.  We will
  have to espouse it and make it work for us in the same way
  that it has worked for others.
  
  4.   Like many people around the world, we are at a fork in
  the  road.  The path we choose will alter our future  --
  perhaps irrevocably.  Even as we sit back and question its
  usefulness, the K-Economy is posing its own challenges for
  us.  Can we master it or will those who master it race ahead
  of us, leaving us breathless as the industrial age had done
  in the past.  Will we again lose out because we are late in
  grasping the opportunity to start together with others?
   
  5.   Whether we enter the new economy early or late, one
  thing is certain.  We cannot ignore this radical turn in the
  way  business is done, in the way economy is managed and
  grown.  We cannot ignore the massive leverage that knowledge
  provides those with the skill to use knowledge.
  
  6.   Knowledge of course have always played a role in the
  progress  of  nations.  Knowledge of the stars  and  the
  geography of continents had enabled the early civilisations
  to  trade with distant places and exploit distant lands.
  Knowledge of the sciences had contributed to the industrial
  age.   But  today knowledge refers more to the speed  of
  communication and the spread of information and data.
  
  7.   Everything that anyone needs to know in order to make a
  decision  is  at everyone's fingertips literally.    The
  deciding factor is the skill and the speed with which one
  uses the information in order to decide.  And that skill and
  speed comes from the depth of knowledge that one has of how
   the different elements and technological capacities can be
  made to work to yield a desired result.
  
  8.   Never in the history of human civilisation has software
  become so important a complement of hardware.  The hardware
  may be the same but software determines what hardware can
  deliver or not deliver.  As new software are developed the
  old hardware will become more versatile, delivering what it
  was not able to deliver before.  And software, more than
  hardware,  is dependent on knowledge and the innovations
  which come from it.
  
  9.   Thus everyone knows of Electronic-commerce but it took
  a man with ideas and knowledge to come up with Amazon.com.
  Suddenly  billion of dollars worth of worldwide business
  becomes  possible for a single man with an unknown  low-
  capital company.  The means of communication, the data and
  the goods are there but knowledge about the way goods can be
  procured,  paid for and delivered in a modern  financial
  system made Amazon.com a fantastic business.  It is not yet
   profitable but it has certainly pioneered the way business
  will be done in the knowledge-based economy.
  
  10.  We should all be enthusiastic about knowledge as the
  basis for doing business.  But we should also remember that
  when new things replace the old there will always be a cost.
  The  ease  of selling through cyber-space will  probably
  increase  the consumption of products but it  will  also
  destroy those who were in the business before the K-economy.
  Thus  when dot.coms businesses supply goods and services
  faster,  more efficiently and at lowers costs,  the  old
  players will be put out of business.  There is much talk of
  creative destruction.  It is fine if what is destroyed is
  owned by those who create, but far too often they are not
  the same people.  Thus others will have to pay the price for
  the success of the new creations of the new E-business.
  
  11.   When the dot.com companies supply directly to  the
  consumers, they and the delivering companies  will  make
   money.  But the old importers, distributors and retailers
  will go out of business.  Indeed even Governments may lose
  out as the small quantities of goods delivered direct to the
  consumers may attract no duty at all.  And of course the
  Government  will lose the corporate tax  paid  by  local
  companies including the transport companies.
  
  12.  Whether this is good or bad is difficult to determine
  now.  We have not had enough experience of the real workings
  of E-commerce and the Knowledge economy.  There may be other
  benefits to the destroyed businesses and to the Government.
  Possibly  the  increase in the volume of  business  will
  generate  more business and more revenue.  But we  don't
  really know.  What we do know is that the destruction may be
  considerable and there will be disruptions and instability.
  
  13.  The enthusiasm about the K-economy is infectious. Many
  see  unlimited growth and unprecedented new wealth being
  generated.  They see the dot.com and other Internet-based
   companies  as  money spinners. Unable to take  advantage
  themselves of knowledge and the ease of communication that
  has presented itself, they go into a frenzy of investments
  putting money in anything at all that is even distinctly
  related to E-commerce.
  
  14.  The result is predictable.  The shares of the dot.com
  companies  sky-rocketed  until  they  bear  no  relation
  whatsoever  to the actual business being done.   Dot.com
  companies may be based on knowledge but they still have to
  deliver goods and services at prices which will give them a
  reasonable return.  In the rush to take advantage of the new
  ways of exploiting data and knowledge, the economics  of
  doing business, the cost and the returns appear to have been
  given  too  little attention.  As a result profits  were
  difficult to achieve.
  
  15.  But as company shares shoot up there was a feeling of
  euphoria over easy money, of wealth from nothing more than a
  belief in the wonder of dot.com companies.  As shares sky-
   rocketed more money is poured into the purchase of shares.
  Loans were raised based on the value of these rapidly rising
  shares and expectations of more capital appreciation.
  
  16.  The bubble grew and grew and as expected it bursts.  A
  lot  of people got hurt.  A lot of money was lost.   And
  suddenly  dot.com companies became liabilities as  their
  failure to make money became general knowledge.
  
  17.  But this does not mean that dot.com are incapable of
  making profits or of growing.  As is usual with business,
  good management and proper accounting of the real potential
  will yield good returns.  There will be capital gains but
  such gains must be related to assets and performance and not
  romance or fanciful expectations.
  
  18.  Malaysians must embrace E-commerce and the Knowledge
  Economy.   But  Malaysians must not place  too  high  an
  expectation from this new business.  There is a lot of money
  to be made from the right kind of application of data and
  knowledge, the right software and the right ideas.  It is
   entirely possible for E-companies to grow rapidly and to
  yield high returns for the innovators and entrepreneurs.
  There  will  be failures but this should not  deter  the
  realists bent on exploiting new ways of doing business.
  
  19.   The most attractive thing about E-commerce is  how
  easily  you can become global.  Borders do not  restrict
  business  the  way  they do the old businesses.   Market
  penetration is much easier.  There is no need to appoint
  agents,  and  distributors.  The sale is direct  to  the
  consumer.  The efficient and worldwide delivery services
  provided by such companies as DHL and UPS ensures that goods
  are  delivered to the customers without need  for  local
  transport and delivery companies.
  
  20.  Start-up companies in the Internet-based business come
  fast and furious.  They are really based on ideas for the
  application  of  data and the speed  and  directness  of
  communication.  But financing a new business will always be
  difficult despite the venture capitalists being willing to
   lose money on nine-tenth of their investments.  But when a
  company  hits  pay-dirt the returns can  be  very,  very
  considerable.  Market capitalisations can grow very rapidly.
  E-commerce companies which are only a few years old have
  been known to buy up major corporations which are more than
  a century old.
  
  21.   In  E-commerce experience can even be a hindrance,
  especially experience in the old business and the old way of
  doing  business.  As a result many who venture  into  E-
  business are young people, usually in their twenties, who
  had  just  come out of universities.  But  a  university
  education is not a necessity.  Indeed many of  the  most
  successful people involved in start-ups of E-business are
  university drop-outs.  So no one need feel discouraged if
  they have a good idea about an innovative application of
  knowledge and data and the exploitation of the vast amount
  of  information available on the Internet.  It is always
  possible that their ideas may work and venture-capitalists
   might be convinced enough of the feasibility so as to invest
  in it.
  
  22.  Facilities are available in Malaysia now to test out
  ideas and concepts of E-business.  The Universities  and
  Cyberjaya have incubators where investments required  is
  small  and  common facilities are available.   Once  the
  business develops and are viable enough it can  move  to
  better facilities.
  
  23.   The  Knowledge  Economy is about  information  and
  knowledge leading to better products and services.  Even
  growing `sawi' can be a K-Economy activity if the `sawi'
  grower uses the Net to get information on how best to grow
  `sawi' or on how to link supply and demand more efficiently.
  
  24.  I would like to challenge every single MCA member here
  today to start looking at everything from the perspective of
  cyberspace.  How can you do the things that you are doing
  now better and more profitably by applying knowledge and
  readily available access to data and communication.
  
  25.  Today's seminar will not result in knowledge unless it
   produces  a change in your behaviour.  Information  only
  becomes knowledge when it becomes so much a part of the way
  you improve and enhance the way you do things.
  
  26.  The Knowledge Economy is all about learning. As long as
  we are prepared to keep learning from each other and from
  the world, the Knowledge Economy should be a piece of cake -
  and an ever expanding one at that.
   


 
Google